This page has been formatted for easy printing

Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!

by James Leroy Wilson
May 26, 2015

As of this writing, the Golden State Warriors and the Cleveland Cavaliers appear headed to the NBA Finals.

In such a contest, the Warriors will be heavily favored because it's facing an exhausted LeBron James, and a hobbled Kyrie Irving. It won't have to face the injured Kevin Love at all.

That a broken Cavs team can go up 3-0 on the 60-win Atlanta Hawks team is a testament to James's greatness. But many also say it underscores the weakness of the Eastern Conference.

The complaint's been ongoing for years. Since Michael Jordan retired, the West has won 11 out of 16 titles. Sometimes, a 45-win team in the West missed the playoffs the same year one or two teams with losing records made it in the East.

Some, notably Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, have called for conference re-alignment.

But I have a question: why have conferences at all?

The reason seems to be, "because we've always had them!" It's ingrained in major American sports leagues.

But the NBA can shake it up. Instead of two conferences of three divisions just, have five divisions.

These teams will be geographically close -- or as close as can be in the West. At least, no one has to travel across two time zones to face division rivals, as three teams in the Northwest Division currently have to do.

Here are the proposed divisions, followed by explanations of scheduling and the playoffs:

Great Lakes (or, for fun, the Jordan Division)








Northeast (Russell Division)



New York





Southeast (um, uh, Elvis Division?)






New Orleans


Southwest (Duncan Division)


San Antonio


Oklahoma City




Pacific (Kareem Division)


LA Clippers

LA Lakers

Golden State





  • 6 games each vs. division opponents = 30 games; home court split evenly.
  • 3 games each vs. one team in each other division, according to last season's placing (1st place v 1st place, 2nd place vs 2nd place) = 12 games. Home court will be 2-1 against two of these teams, and 1-2 against the other two.
  • 2 games each vs. remaining non-division teams = 40 games; home court split evenly.

Total: 82 games, same as now!


  • Playoff seeding is 1-16, according to record.
  • In the event of identical records, the higher seed goes to the team that finished higher in its own division (2nd place in a division seeds higher than 3rd place if the records are the same)
  • If there's still a tie for seeding, the team with the better non-division record gets the higher seed

(No need to go on with further tie-breakers at this point.)

This will mean:

  • More geographical rivalry games
  • Incentive to finish as well as possible in conference standings, not just overall standings
  • A greater likelihood that the two best, or most-deserving, teams end up in the finals.

Why have conferences?    

About the Author:

James Leroy Wilson is author of Ron Paul Is A Nut (And So Am I)He blogs at Independent Country and writes for and the Zero Aggression Project. Opinions expressed here do not represent the views of anyone but himself.

This column appears every Tuesday only in The Partial Observer.

This article was printed from
Copyright © 2021 All rights reserved.