Home
Loading
  Contact Us    
The Secret of Janet Jackson's Breast

Freedom, government, and a phony culture war.

by James Leroy Wilson
February 26, 2004

Bookmark and Share


When we read stories or watch movies of sailors on the sea, or of the (overwhelmingly male) population of the Old West, it is easy to wonder why there wasn’t as much violence and homosexual rape as we now see in modern prisons. After all, overwhelmingly male environments invite such trouble, don’t they?

But such is not the case. That was not the culture. Instead, bad guys were hanged. And there’s one key reason, one that should clarify what “freedom” really is.

Freedom is not freedom from poverty. Freedom is not safety, or freedom from danger.

Freedom is, well, to be free. The pioneers were free. The laborers in the city were free (and often better off than the pioneers). Sailors were free. Prisoners are not.

The prison, the caging of the human animal, is like a reverse invisible hand. Prisons make life worse for us (because we are forced to pay for them) and make the prisoners themselves worse.

And that’s because the prisoner has nothing to live for. No future ahead - or even if one will soon be freed, far fewer resources for self-improvement than can be had in free society. The short-term pleasures are therefore valued higher than the long-term gain. And, since we are talking about often violent people, their idea of “pleasure” isn’t exactly watching the symphony on PBS.

What inspires a free person is something to live for. Doing what one enjoys doing, and/or providing for loved ones and/or building a better future for oneself. The pioneers had it. The factory laborers had it. The sailors had it. Prisoners don’t have it.

Depravity, however one wants to define it, sets in as soon as we see our freedoms diminished. Once we can not live for ourselves, but are forced, more and more, to live for others through taxes and regulations, the less free we are. Likewise, the more we depend on government aid instead of our own initiative for our well-being, the less free we are.

The prisoner gets it both ways: he is forced to live for “others,” that is, he exists in order to make society feel better about itself because such a person has been locked up. Likewise, he is completely dependent on the government for his existence.

A devastating one-two combination. Maybe prisons are necessary (I have my doubts) to keep violent criminals out of society. But rehabilitation is, if not impossible, quite improbable.

Likewise, where do we see most violent crime? It is in urban ghettoes, where taxes and regulations discourage business investment and where, therefore, illegal trade, such as the drug trade, flourishes. Likewise, we see it in places where the government schools are so incompetently run that its victims grow up barely literate and often unemployable. And where more people collect government welfare checks.

Those most dependent on the government are not free, and are thus more likely to succumb to the allure of crime or other self-destructive behavior.

But this applies not only to the most dependent, but to everyone with a dependency on the government, albeit to a lesser degree. For we are all, supposedly, guaranteed the safety nets of Social Security and unemployment insurance. Who pays for it? You and me through taxes and government-induced inflation. And the next generation, through even higher taxes to pay interest on the debt, or even higher inflation.

That is, we don’t have to take care of ourselves, the government will - other people will. The politicians promise it, the Christian preachers of both the Left and the so-called Right tell us this is social justice and recommend voting for politicians who endorse this vision.

And then they wonder why civilization is declining.

It is declining because people have less to live for, because they are not free to live for themselves and their loved ones. If somebody else takes care of us and our families, and this by legal entitlement, then what are we to do?

This is the crisis of father-less families, especially but not only among African-Americans. If government provides, why should I provide? The moral capital of religious faith isn’t always sufficient for most people. It is important, not only as an article of faith, to be moral and personally responsible, it must also be an economic imperative. But the government’s “safety net” guarantees, and more importantly, its taxing away of a large portion of our income, discourages such far-sighted thinking and action.

For when government takes from us, and makes us dependent on it, we truly, like the prisoner (although not to the same degree), have less to live for. We are not free to use as much of our own resources as we see fit. We are thus less able to provide for the future, reduced instead to praying that the government won’t fall into bankruptcy.

And then there are other controls on our life, especially the War on Drugs. With that War, which violates more provisions of the Constitution more than does any other federal program, the government is telling us point blank that we are irresponsible adolescents who don’t know what’s good for us.

The less we can focus on the long-term, the more we focus on the present. The more the government treats us like children, the more we will act like children.

And this is the secret of Janet Jackson letting her breast be exposed during the Super Bowl halftime show. And of the Madonna-Brittany Spears kiss. We are a nation of bored people, wanting the next distraction and entertainment. Our media companies and entertainers know this. This also explains the explosion of legal gambling. And, in large degree, the spectacle of the Super Bowl itself, with or without a “decent” halftime show. What Murray Sperber called the modern NCAA Division I university culture may as well be applied to the nation itself: we are a culture of “beer and circuses.”

Not that there’s anything wrong with circuses, or with beer. It is rather a question of, what is our nation not just entertained by, but transfixed upon? Do we care about the things we care about because they are important, or because we are bored and looking for a diversion? And aren’t we bored because the things we should care about, our work and our family, are now the government’s responsibility instead of our own?

The Jackson controversy is itself a case in point. The fact that it’s a controversy is itself a diversion: should the FCC step in, or should this be left alone? This renews the phony-baloney “culture war” that has created fake divisions between Democrats and Republicans, so that they can dupe us into agreeing with their bi-partisan foreign wars, Drug War, crackdown on civil liberties, explosion of federal Department of Education’s budget, and so much else.

With the culture war, the big lie is perpetuated: Democrats are socialist and anti-family; Republicans are racist, uptight fundamentalists. There is, in fact, zero evidence of any of this having been true, ever. But it makes for effective scare-mongering. And that’s all the culture war is, scare mongering to blind us to the real injustices, the real invasions of liberty.

With Big Government nanny-state provision, and paternalistic rules, politicians of both major parties want to pretend that they will take care of us, and especially “the children.” But they haven’t. All they’ve done is turn us all into immature adolescents, transfixed on sex and violence. Since we’re no longer allowed to live our own lives, what else can be expected?

To reverse the cultural slide is not to pass this or that law, or this or that amendment. Rather, it is to allow as much freedom as possible.

Comments (4)


Post a Comment

Michael H. Thomson from Merritt Island, Florida writes:
February 26, 2004
I read James Leroy Wilson's piece trying to find one sliver of fault with it. I could not. He hits the nail on the head.

Our society has not reached the decadent(bored) proportions of Caligula's Rome, but its getting close.

To Mr. Wilson, Bravo!

Jonathan Wilson from Chicago writes:
February 26, 2004
As a Christian preacher, I know whereof James Leroy Wilson speaks. Pew cards with candidate profiles will not be part of a church I serve if I end up serving very long. And symposiums hosted by various seminaries talk the issues of social justice to death. The agendas are inevitably socialism since, like most Americans, academics are too lazy to consider alternatives beyond the Statist approaches.

It is easy to preach that social justice is everyone'es responsibility, because it is: The prophets, the words of Jesus, set that responsibility squarely in the hearts of everyone. However, when that preaching urges that the responsibility, since it is everyone's, be assumed collectively, in effect that makes it no one's personal responsibility anymore, and the responsibilities are assumed by bureaucracy's at federal and other levels of government.

The challenge, when I preach about the heart of God for hospitality, compassion, and righteous justice, is that people want to cast my words according to their political presentiments. I finally shouted from the pulpit that I found both the Democrat and Republican platforms disgusting. I guess it's pretty clear where my political stripe is being painted. Thank you, JLW, for the article.

Anita Salzer from New Hudson, Michigan writes:
November 1, 2004
I do think there are definite problems in our country today - but many I don't hear people talking about because I think many don't even realize they are there. The schools are teaching that believing anything is o.k. which is not true. While our Constitution permits people to believe various things, believing anything is not ok - there are things that are right and wrong with real consequences. Alot of people in our schools are talking to our kids on subjects on non academic issues and no one really knows what they are saying. When a person tries to object, so often they get passed from person to person or it is their word against someone else's, or the school doesn't see a problem. As a Christian person in this country today, I challenge anyone else to write 20 letters to any news publication and see if any of them get printed. You have a better chance of winning the lottery. So much for the free exchange of ideas. Another area of our country with unchecked power. (the challenge issued above is for letters from a Christian, -non liberal-point of view.) The moveon.org website, when I went on there, was openly advocating censorship. I object to the standards of newspapers regarding letters to the editor - that there must be a limit of 200 words - while this may be a good general rule, it may not always be easy to stick to that and so where that happens, I feel like that is censorship. They say that they need to limit letters because they get so many - I wonder how many they really do get and why they don't devote more space to them. I wonder why, despite all the letters I've written, why not a one has gotten printed. It seems that many letters printed are well written - I think a variety of letters, even from those maybe less articulate should be printed - a requirement of participating in a democracy should not be how eloquent a person is. I feel our country is, in fact, in crisis today, but I also feel that God will, and is helping us.

Anna Marie Oudal from Eagle River, alaska writes:
July 1, 2006
It couldn't have been said better. Thanks.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*


Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Location:


Comments:*
Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.



Verification:
Please type the letters you see above.

  Printer-Friendly

Bookmark and Share


PO BOOKS BY JAMES LEROY WILSON
Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
EMAIL ALERTS
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
The Secret of Janet Jackson's Breast
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)


RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article May I Be Frank, Mr. President?
Challenging a double standard in the Oval Office
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/15/17
Salvator Mundi
Not the painting but the Person
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/7/17
When the Newsman Becomes News
Lamenting yet another fallen hero
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/1/17
Let's Hear It for Moms and Pops
Celebrating Small Business Saturday in a very personal way
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/22/17
An Earthquake in La La Land
Examining what's been exposed in the rubble
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/17/17
Where is God?
Reflecting on the tragedy in a little Texas town
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/10/17
An All Saints Day Tribute
Remembering those who left us
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/3/17

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.


RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2017 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top