Home
Loading
  Contact Us    
Foolish Consistencies and Inconsistencies

Stale absurdities in the Bush White House.

by Barnabas
April 21, 2004

Bookmark and Share


"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines."  
— Ralph Waldo Emerson

"Why should I sleep in my own bed if I don’t want to? There’s always the floor."
— Somerset Maugham, The Circle

Mr. Bush, who is in the midst of a campaign for re-election, said last Sunday that none of the warnings gave any hint of the time, place or date of an assault. "Had I known there was going to be an attack on America I would have moved mountains to stop the attack," he said. 
— New York Times, April 18

"Is this what we meant by a smoking gun? Do you think? Oh well. Bombs away."
— Barnabas, Two months before the shock and awe campaign

Emerson’s famous line must be some comfort to the White House right now, as long as they remember that it does not mean that inconsistency is always wise. Both consistency and inconsistency can be very foolish indeed. It was foolishly consistent to launch a major war on evidence that was either tenuous or false, and foolishly inconsistent  for the President   to assert that he needed detailed evidence before responding to the Al Qaida threat in August 2001. This White House loves evidence when it confirms what they want to do, and discounts evidence when it points in another direction. As I wrote two months before "shock and awe" began, almost any pretext will justify what you want to do. And it did. And it still does, as in We’ll define what we mean by "smoking gun" as soon as we’re ready to do what we were going to do anyway.

The standard of evidence required  for anti-terrorist action was much higher than the standard required  to wage all-out war. The disparity  illustrates what I want to address today. 

My role in this magazine is to alert its readers to absurdities and ethical conundrums that surface in the news. I planned never to run out of material because in public life there are always fresh absurdities and ethical screwups. They are par for everyone in public life, including my own small role in it

The Bush administration, however, is not creative in the absurdity and screwup departments. They are into repetition and appear to learn nothing even the third or fourth time around. Their mantra seems to be, "However disastrous its outcome, it was by definition the right thing to do because we do not do wrong things."

So I find myself writing about the same problems I was addressing eighteen months ago. Stale absurdities provoke stale responses. In most of life’s situations, it doesn’t matter much. The people who repeat the same absurdities over and over are considered bores. We put up with them or manage to stay out of their way.

But this is the White House! This is the Presidency of the most powerful nation on earth! We can’t stay out of its way, and putting up with it tars us with its brush. Above all other positions, it is required of the President that he and his associates learn from their absurdities and screwups and find more effective ways to communicate and act. When this doesn’t happen, we are all embarrassed – Republicans and Democrats, supporters and critics. Embarrassment is an equal-opportunity condition.

Am I being fair? Consider the President’s own take on his behavior. At his press conference last week, he was asked what mistakes he had made in the War on Terror. He couldn’t remember any. Most people in his place wouldn't forget any.

I know this is difficult for the President’s supporters to fathom, considering some letters  in our daily paper, but some of the President’s critics are not looking for excuses to "bash Bush." We do not want the President to be absurd or to screw up so we can criticize him. He is, after all, our President too, and the stakes are too high for Americans to want their President to fail in order to give temporary political advantage to someone else. Some of us actually want the President, of either party, to know his job and to fulfill his responsibilities with intelligence and competence.

Comments (2)


Post a Comment

Jonathan Wilson from Chicago writes:
April 21, 2004
Indeed, Bush was my man in 2000. He set forward a statesmanlike vision of peaceful engagement in foreign policy as part of his campaign. I did what he suggested with tax cuts that were real for me: I invested the difference. I bash Bush now because of the absurdities, because of the betrayal of vision, because after years of Janet Reno I was ready for a break from fascism, only to see the Patriot Act rise like a phoenix from the ashes of the World Trade Center. I do not bash Bush because I support Kerry - I am despairing for this election and our alternatives.

Michael H. Thomson from Merritt Island, Florida writes:
April 22, 2004
Our alternatives are slim in this election, but if the Republic can survive another four years of Bush or four years of John Kerry - the opportunity for a viable third party emergence seems greater than ever.

Having said that there may even be an alternative in this years election. By being positioned so early as the nominee, John Kerry may have inadvertently been shot in the foot. My personal opinion is that this guy's campaign is a house of cards.

What would happen if prior to the convention, revelations of a Gary Hart nature emerged that will put pressure on Kerry not to stand for the nomination. At that point - all bets would be off.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*


Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Location:


Comments:*
Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.



Verification:
Please type the letters you see above.

  Printer-Friendly

Bookmark and Share


EMAIL ALERTS
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
Foolish Consistencies and Inconsistencies
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by Barnabas
Barnabas Says Goodbye
Moving on, not moving out.
by Barnabas, 1/19/05
Seats on the Fifty-Yard Line
Yet another American value.
by Barnabas, 1/12/05
Ethical Endgame
When children become sexual slaves.
by Barnabas, 12/15/04
Eighteen Years on Death Row
We have redefined 'speedy trial' and 'cruel and unusual.'
by Barnabas, 12/8/04
Hard on Drugs, Soft in the Head
Legalizing marijuana.
by Barnabas, 12/1/04
Wesley and Wal-Mart
Destructive competition as a stinky enterprise.
by Barnabas, 11/24/04
The Mandate to Govern
Third party time.
by Barnabas, 11/17/04
» Complete List (137)


Recently Published
View Article Salvator Mundi
Not the painting but the Person
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/7/17
When the Newsman Becomes News
Lamenting yet another fallen hero
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/1/17
Let's Hear It for Moms and Pops
Celebrating Small Business Saturday in a very personal way
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/22/17
An Earthquake in La La Land
Examining what's been exposed in the rubble
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/17/17
Where is God?
Reflecting on the tragedy in a little Texas town
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/10/17
An All Saints Day Tribute
Remembering those who left us
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/3/17
A Mighty Fortress was His God
Remembering the legacy of Martin Luther 500 years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/27/17

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.


RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2017 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top