Home
Loading
  Contact Us    
A Better World without Saddam

#3 on the list of the world’s dictators - what about #1 and 2?

by Barnabas
September 29, 2004

Bookmark and Share


For the second time in a row, Kim Jong-il, 63, is the "world's worst dictator." His regime has been judged most repressive of its own people, "more completely than any other in the world." Freedom House has ranked North Korea as the "worst" in 31 straight years. Some dictators are indeed more durable than others.
— Philippine Daily Inquirer, March 21, 2004

"The world is a lot better off without Saddam Hussein," gets my vote as the silliest, most disingenuous line in the presidential campaign; yet when it is uttered, usually in what used to be called Pulpit Tones, everybody clamors to agree with it. Nobody wants to appear to be on Saddam’s side. The line is allowed to stand as a justification for the incompetence, bad judgment, and waste entailed in our effort to get rid of Saddam. 

We may at least ask the obvious follow-up question, "Just how much better off?"

We can’t yet tell, since the war that toppled Saddam is ongoing. Berra’s famous line applies to warfare as to baseball: "It ain’t over till it’s over." I doubt that the rate of violent death in Iraq has decreased much since the days of Saddam. So many ungrateful Iraqis would rather kill foreign troops than be liberated by them, answering the President’s invitation to "Bring ‘em on." This in turn requires the foreign troops to keep killing them. That will teach them to be grateful!

Let’s suppose that Iraq will be better off without Saddam, the sooner the better, a free, democratic Iraq without an AK-47 in sight.

Then what? Saddam was not the top honcho in the dictating game; he was number 3. A new number three has already taken his spot. As in any game, a second-stringer has moved up. If getting rid of dictators were our goal all along, as the American administration seemed to remember several months into the war, why didn’t we go after numbers 1 and 2, taking them out in the order of their awfulness? Now we’ve spent all these lives, all this time and money, and all have to show for it, as a certainty, is a third-rate dictator behind bars. Numbers 1 and 2 are still out there, victimizing their own people and intimidating their neighbors, while the new 3 through 10 are waiting in the wings.

How much better off are we? I’m reminded of the surgeon who, upon opening the patient up, discovered that there was nothing wrong with her after all. Since he had gone that far, he took out her appendix. She is now better off in the sense that she will never get appendicitis.

We resemble that patient. We are better off without Hussein, as she is better off without her appendix. It’s an exaggeration, however, to declare that we are a lot better off.

Comments (1)


Post a Comment

S.E. Shepherd from Chicago, IL writes:
September 29, 2004
There has been a subtle change in American foreign policy - we have gone from defending democracy to spreading democracy. Initially I thought it had begun with the current administration, but I realize this goes back to Reagan and beyond.

We can argue the validity of both the Korean and Vietnam wars, but at least we were defending active governments from being overthrown. In the 70's and 80’s the American government moved into aiding subversive groups into toppling governments it found anti- American (Chile, Philippines, Nicaragua), but it wasn't until Grenada that a U.S. President actively sent in American troops to force a change in another country's government. This was followed by Bush in the late 80's, when he forcibly removed Panamanian President Manuel Noriega. Both of these changes were diversion tactics for military failures elsewhere. In 1983, a suicide bomber attacked a U.S. Marine compound in Lebanon, killing 283 marines. Reagan's resolve? Free Grenada from Communist rebels. Bush Sr., suffering from a wimp image, decided to remove Noriega in 1989 (after putting Noriega in power in the 70's, as the head of the CIA).

Bush Jr., realizing the difficult task of actually capturing Osama bin Laden, went after another straw dictator in Hussein, only it seems the people of Iraq had more teeth than he expected.

The reason we don't take out dictators #1 and 2 is because that would involve more death and destruction than any American president is willing to sacrifice (he might not get re-elected). Dictators like Hussein (and lesser) seem like sure bets for American Presidents to flex their military muscles and make people believe they are making the world a better place.

Are we better off with Hussein removed? If enough people believe it so, it must be true.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*


Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Location:


Comments:*
Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.



Verification:
Please type the letters you see above.

  Printer-Friendly

Bookmark and Share


EMAIL ALERTS
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
A Better World without Saddam
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by Barnabas
Barnabas Says Goodbye
Moving on, not moving out.
by Barnabas, 1/19/05
Seats on the Fifty-Yard Line
Yet another American value.
by Barnabas, 1/12/05
Ethical Endgame
When children become sexual slaves.
by Barnabas, 12/15/04
Eighteen Years on Death Row
We have redefined 'speedy trial' and 'cruel and unusual.'
by Barnabas, 12/8/04
Hard on Drugs, Soft in the Head
Legalizing marijuana.
by Barnabas, 12/1/04
Wesley and Wal-Mart
Destructive competition as a stinky enterprise.
by Barnabas, 11/24/04
The Mandate to Govern
Third party time.
by Barnabas, 11/17/04
» Complete List (137)


Recently Published
View Article May I Be Frank, Mr. President?
Challenging a double standard in the Oval Office
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/15/17
Salvator Mundi
Not the painting but the Person
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/7/17
When the Newsman Becomes News
Lamenting yet another fallen hero
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/1/17
Let's Hear It for Moms and Pops
Celebrating Small Business Saturday in a very personal way
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/22/17
An Earthquake in La La Land
Examining what's been exposed in the rubble
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/17/17
Where is God?
Reflecting on the tragedy in a little Texas town
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/10/17
An All Saints Day Tribute
Remembering those who left us
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/3/17

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.


RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2017 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top