Home
Loading
  Contact Us    
Does America Deserve to be Nuked?

On Pearl Harbor and the price of pre-emptive war.

by James Leroy Wilson
October 14, 2004

Bookmark and Share


1941 was a frustrating year for President Roosevelt. He was giving away war materiel to Great Britain. His navy tried and tried to provoke Germany into “firing the first shot” that would bring the USA into the war against Germany. Hitler wouldn’t take the bait, even though the USA’s actions of aiding Britain, and transporting supplies to them, were themselves acts of war on Germany.

So FDR instead looked to Japan. He had been planning this since 1938. His New Deal was prolonging, not ending, the Great Depression. But during war, the industrial capacity of the USA could quickly rev up. The Great War established this. To FDR, and to most of his admirers since, the solution for economic ills is to print up more money for the government to spend. Battleships would end the Great Depression.

To Japan, who from the previous century was pressured - even forced - to integrate with the rest of the world, evolving into a respected world power meant establishing an empire, as Spain, Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and the USA had done. Territory, and governing foreign peoples, means strength and glory. So Japan embarked on that mission by invading China.

So FDR knew what he had to do: provoke Japan. Cut off trade, including precious oil, to that country. Freeze Japanese assets in the United States. And then promise the Allies that if Japan, in its need for natural resources, invades Europe’s South Pacific possessions, that the USA would enter the war against Japan.

Am I suggesting that Japan was in the right? Not at all. Imperialism and wars of aggression are evil. The important question is not Japan’s morality in trying to establish an empire, but rather, what were her generals thinking when they attacked Pearl Harbor?

There is one answer: pre-emptive war. Did Japan want to conquer the United States? Not at all. But America had clearly established itself as a “threat” to Japan. Japan needed the resources of the South Pacific territories of Europe, which FDR pledged to defend. The solution? Destroy America’s Pacific Fleet. Attack Pearl Harbor.

Was attacking Pearl Harbor a mistake? Hindsight is, of course, 20/20. For Japan to have imperial ambitions at all was a mistake. But in the mind of the Japanese general, was the USA quite as “innocent” as Americans now believe?

That is the question. Japan’s reasons for attacking Pearl Harbor make sense. I’m not saying justified or excusable, but they were reasonable in light of their own circumstance and self-interest. They had sufficient reason to believe that the USA was going to war against them anyway. The reasonable option was to strike first - hope that the first blow would be the knock-out.

Japan thus fell into FDR’s trap. FDR craved war, and finally got it. America was too big, too strong. In the end, massive bombing of Japan’s cities culminated in the nuclear strikes at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The USA, by any objective standard, posed a far greater threat to Japan, than Iraq ever did, whether in 1991 or 2003, to the USA Actually, it is more accurate to say the Iraq never was a threat to the USA. Japan attacked what it reasonably saw was a hostile nation that posed a threat to its ambitions, and got repaid with massive conventional bombings and two nuclear strikes.

If this is the price for pre-emptive war that Japan paid, what will be the price America pays? How many tens of thousands of Iraqis have we killed and maimed for no reason?

Why wouldn’t many Iraqis and other Arabs thus feel, as payback, that America richly deserves its own nuclear attacks, such as we disproportionately repaid Japan?

Is it because America is a democracy that we’re always in the right and our actions are justified? Or because we’re still largely Christian? Or white? I don’t know. But if we separate our sentimental attachments to this country and step back, we will see that we have far more in common with empires and aggressor nations than we care to admit. And as all the others eventually fell into ruin, perhaps we should learn some lessons and reverse our course. Do we want a nuclear bomb to go off in our country and have much of the world say that we had it coming?

If not, then the best protection against WMD’s coming to our shores is to pull out of Iraq and the rest of the world. Everyone in the world would be a lot safer and better off if the USA just minded her own business.

Comments (3)


Post a Comment

Jonathan Wilson from Chicago writes:
October 14, 2004
James Leroy moves beyond knee-jerk patriotism to examine the underlying principles of what is truly best for a people and a nation and the whole world. The lessons of the Axis and the Stalinists is that ideological aggression against foreign nations cannot achieve a lasting victory. These were defeated by wars both hot and cold. Yet now the Anglo-American Nexus is pursuing an agenda of ideological aggression. President Bush made this clear in his third debate with Senator Kerry just last night. He is the one who defines liberty. He is the one who determines when people are ready to build the lasting institutions of democracy. The hubris of the neoconservative agenda is as dangerous and unethical as any other brand of imperialism that ideology has birthed. I believe James Leroy is the true patriot.

Sincerely, A Christian, a Conservative, and a long way from voting a second term for Bush.

Michael H. Thomson from transitioning to Virginia writes:
October 14, 2004
JLW, I fear for us all when those people - I won't mention their names - kick in the doors of PO World Headquarters. By the way, do you know where that's at?

TOM RHODES from US writes:
August 1, 2009
i would say that yes it's about time that we be nuclear weapons be used on america. we have a country that has continued to lie to the american people and we go on thinking we are right about everything.

this cannot continue. we have lied to the american people starting with 1937 with the marijuana laws. we have going with the idea that it drives people crazy and the newspapers have continued this because of the hearst newspapers. we now no that it is a lie. the hearst papers did start this lie because of they owed large tracks of land to feed the newspapers need for pulp. dupont had created a process at the time to convert wood to pulp. this law was created to protect
their interests in this conversion of wood to pulp.

this is now starting to foster people with the truth about using our land to grow cannabis.

we need to start useing our land correctly and stop global warming now.

if the law is allowed to continue like it has since 1937 we will have created a mess of our forest, air, water and lastly fish. those resources are being wasted and this planet will pay us back with global warming.

now is the time to stop being ignorant about our resourses wisely now or face the consequenses. one way of stopping this may involve nuclear weapons against america. even a dirty bomb does the trick without the destuction of the land and property.

just a few may do the trick and stop us from doing harm to more the planet. we should never ruin the atmosphere our the world will come to abrupt end of life globally.

that is all i have to say about the lies of america.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*


Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Location:


Comments:*
Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.



Verification:
Please type the letters you see above.

  Printer-Friendly

Bookmark and Share


PO BOOKS BY JAMES LEROY WILSON
Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
EMAIL ALERTS
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
Does America Deserve to be Nuked?
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)


RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article Salvator Mundi
Not the painting but the Person
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/7/17
When the Newsman Becomes News
Lamenting yet another fallen hero
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/1/17
Let's Hear It for Moms and Pops
Celebrating Small Business Saturday in a very personal way
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/22/17
An Earthquake in La La Land
Examining what's been exposed in the rubble
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/17/17
Where is God?
Reflecting on the tragedy in a little Texas town
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/10/17
An All Saints Day Tribute
Remembering those who left us
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/3/17
A Mighty Fortress was His God
Remembering the legacy of Martin Luther 500 years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/27/17

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.


RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2017 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top