Home
Loading
  Contact Us    
Is War Worth It?

America's record is overrated.

by James Leroy Wilson
May 25, 2006

Bookmark and Share
Is War Worth It?
The word "holiday" comes from "holy day." America's "holy days" include Memorial Day, Flag Day, "Independence" Day (although the USA didn't even win independence on that day), Veterans Day, and President's Day. And I'm probably forgetting a day or two.
 
President's Day itself isn't one to honor all the Presidents, only Washington and Lincoln, who were noted for building the nation through war. Indeed, war is the reason for the other holidays as well. War is the tie that binds the Union together. It was created through war, expanded through war, was "preserved" through war, and became a global empire through military force. Our country's obsession with the "sanctity" of the national flag stems from it being flown in battle. Honoring the flag is one way to honor veterans and those who died in war.
 
There is nothing wrong with showing respect for the sacrifices made for the country, but our militarism is over the top. The Founders of the Republic were themselves quite suspicious of maintaining a permanent army during peacetime, believing it to be an enemy of freedom. They were right: the rise of the "military-industrial complex" correlates the with erosion of personal freedom in the United States, so that today the President believes he can do anything he wants to anyone and justify it on national security grounds. But the United States never faced a genuine national security threat - a threat to its mainland - since the War of 1812. All other "threats," from nuclear war to terrorism, were provoked by our own foreign policy.
 
And really, America's war record is quite overrated. While General Washington deserves credit for keeping the army intact during the Revolutionary War, that was part of a wider conflict between France and England, and England lost mainly because it ran out of money. The War of 1812 did establish the country as one not to be messed with, but it failed in its invasion of Canada. The Mexican War was unnecessary, and the large territory we conquered heightened sectional tensions that led to the War Between the States. And that war, in which over 600,000 soldiers died, was both illegal and unnecessary; the Southern States did have a right to secede. The Spanish-American War was a cakewalk against the pitifully weak Spaniards, but we had no just cause to start it. Furthermore, we acquired a colonial empire from it, and then betrayed our own principles by putting down a rebellion in the Philippines, costing 200,000 Filipino lives.
 
World War I was a military "victory" for the Americans, who joined the fight after both sides were exhausted from three years of trench warfare. But our reason for entering it was nonsensical; German didn't respect "freedom of the seas" when "neutral" ships sent war materiel to Britain, but Britain didn't respect the freedom of the seas either. The post-war diplomatic catastrophe rightly convinced Americans to not get involved in other countries' wars.
 
American involvement in World War II wouldn't occurred as it did if it hadn't illegally annexed Hawaii and gained other Pacific possessions decades before. As it is, we joined the conflict just as Hitler turned his attention toward his east - which is where his ambitions were all along. While the USA whipped Japan and joined with Britain in liberating Southern and Western Europe, 80% of World War II was fought on the Russian Front. While this war lives on as the "good war," and is the basis for the militarism that persists today, the reality is that the communists, with our help, came away as the big victors of World War II.
 
Since then, the USA has often been at war, but they've been undeclared, which means they've been unconstitutional and illegal. And the military's record in this time is such that, if it was any other country's, Americans would make jokes about it. After initial success in defending South Korea, the USA wasted years and lives battling North Korea and China to a draw, and our military is still in Korea 55 years later. Despite killing a million Vietnamese against 50,000 American deaths, America lost in Vietnam. The USA expelled Iraq from Kuwait in 1991, but then embarked on a brutal and unnecessary regime of economic sanctions against Iraq, followed by a disastrous invasion. It "liberated" tiny Grenada, but was humiliated by Somalia - a starving country which didn't even have a government. It cowardly bombed Slobodan Milosevic's Yugoslavia for the crime of putting down a Moslem rebellion in its own country. We reacted to 9-11 by attacking not just Al Qaeda but also the Taliban in Afghanistan, and war is still raging there. Aside from Al Qaeda, none of these enemies had either the interest or capability of attacking the United States directly. Which should make us wonder, what was the point?        
 
While many will spend Memorial Day in remembrance of the sacrifices of our brave men and women, I think the best way to honor them is to ask for what ends did they fight, and what the country really gained by resorting to war so often in its history. Can we really trust any President and/or Congress to decide when to use force - especially overseas against countries that pose no threat to us? Can we really trust our generals to know how to wage "asymmetrical" warfare against guerillas? To join the armed services in this day and age is the biggest leap of faith an individual can make, a leap I wouldn't take myself or suggest to any young person.

Comments (3)


Post a Comment

Eric Lemonholm writes:
May 28, 2006
Good article, lots of good points. One question, however. You say, It [the US] cowardly bombed Slobodan Milosevic's Yugoslavia for the crime of putting down a Moslem rebellion in its own country.

I think your point is that Yugoslavia's internal affairs were none of our business, so we should not have gotten involved. But you make it sound like Milosevic was a martyr, when in fact he was a monster - should not the Muslims have had the right to secede from Yugoslavia without facing ethnic cleansing/genocide?

James Leroy Wilson from Independent Country writes:
May 28, 2006
Milosevic was a monster, but Clinton and both George Bushes were even worse. According to Justin Raimondo (http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8704):

As it turned out, however, the genocide was greatly exaggerated: indeed, it was almost entirely the product of war propaganda, as John Laughland and others revealed to an indifferent world in the war's aftermath. We started out hearing of as many as 100,000 victims of Milosevic's ethnic cleansing, as CNN (then popularly known as the Clinton News Network) assured us. Then, somehow, they decided to pare down the number to around 50,000: however, as the war ended, and the number of bodies seemed hardly in accordance with this estimate, they reduced it to 10,000. But where, critics still wondered, were the bodies? Apparently nowhere to be found. In the end, the truth came out, as it usually does, albeit far too late to prevent an immoral and precedent-setting war: what happened in Kosovo was not an ethnic cleansing, but a civil war, in which the body count showed a nearly equal number of deaths on both sides. The total number of victims, including Kosovars, Serbs, Roma, and others, was under 10,000.

Whereas NATO (i.e., American) bombing of Yugoslavia killed 5,000-7,000 Serbian civilians.

Milosevic may have been a communist/nationalist thug, but his actions were no worse than any national leader that tries to crush a secession movement. Indeed, after four years the kangaroo War Crimes Tribunal still couldn't produce evidence against him, and instead let him die for lack of medical care.

david kompes from Melbourne writes:
September 13, 2006
Whilst, US armed personnel do not perform well in battle, there is no denying the US excels in weapon design, construction and its export. Everyone is good at something. Italians have long ago decided they were better at cooking, wine making and playing football with a spherical ball. On a level playing, it is quite probable an Italian armed division could be soundly defeated by even US troops.

But there are no longer any level playing fields.

At some stage during WW2 the United States found there were limitless profits to be made by designing, manufacturing and supplying weapons to the rest of the world. By the time the war ended the US economy had become irretrievebly addicted to the sale of weapons.

Chronic dependancy requires the addict to increase his consumption to obtain the same high. As the condition becomes entrenched the addicts' behaviour becomes more eratic and desperate and a crisis becomes inevitable.

But you try telling an addict they've got a problem.



Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*


Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Location:


Comments:*
Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.



Verification:
Please type the letters you see above.

  Printer-Friendly

Bookmark and Share


PO BOOKS BY JAMES LEROY WILSON
Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
EMAIL ALERTS
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)


RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article Salvator Mundi
Not the painting but the Person
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/7/17
When the Newsman Becomes News
Lamenting yet another fallen hero
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/1/17
Let's Hear It for Moms and Pops
Celebrating Small Business Saturday in a very personal way
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/22/17
An Earthquake in La La Land
Examining what's been exposed in the rubble
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/17/17
Where is God?
Reflecting on the tragedy in a little Texas town
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/10/17
An All Saints Day Tribute
Remembering those who left us
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/3/17
A Mighty Fortress was His God
Remembering the legacy of Martin Luther 500 years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/27/17

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.


RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?
Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2017 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top