Contact Us    
Israel's Blunder

Israel's actions do not make sense - unless the real motive is to steal land from Lebanon.

by James Leroy Wilson
August 10, 2006

Bookmark and Share
Israel's Blunder

If a football coach orders his team to punt every time it has the ball, we would conclude either he doesn't know what he's doing, or he's deliberately throwing the game.

But why would he throw the game? That leads into speculation of what's going on behind the scenes. Gambling debts? Blackmail? A desire to get fired? Mental illness?

Defenders of the coach would dismiss such conspiracy theories and wacky scenarios. They would say, "Where's the evidence?"

The problem is, there isn't any hard evidence that conclusively supports one theory or another. But there IS hard evidence on the field that something is amiss.

For the first option is even less plausible: NOBODY in the coach's position could be that incompetent. After all, knowing the game of football is the minimal requirement of the job. A person who knows nothing about football isn't pulled off the street to become a football coach.

This hypothetical situation is akin to the judgments of Israel's leadership in its war with Lebanon. Not that Israel is "punting;" If anything, Israel goes for the long bomb on every down and wonders why it isn't making progress. It may inflict damage, but is too predictable.

After four weeks of war, I still encounter apologists for Israel. The standard refrain is, "Israel doesn't target civilians, but Hezbollah does." Although Israel has actually killed twenty times as many civilians as has Hezbollah, the argument goes, it retains an insurmountable lead on the moral scorecard. After all, they say, Israel doesn't mean it.

Let's concede the point for a moment. In a war, the side with greater firepower is bound to inflict more extensive damage than the other. That doesn't mean the stronger is in the wrong, or that the weaker is a victim. "Good guys" have the right to punish "bad guys," regardless of their relative strengths.

Even so, the arguments from Israel's apologists neglect a key point. And it's one even Israel's critics tend to miss. The moral problem isn't in the body counts or infrastructure damage per se. Rather it is that Israel's leaders should have known that bombing Lebanon wouldn't work. They should have known that Hezbollah wouldn't be appreciably weakened, but would instead garner more recruits and support. They should have anticipated the worldwide backlash, and the condemnation of its neighbors. Israel's leaders should have known that the brutal means they used would have no bearing on the ends they claim they want to achieve.

Jimmy Carter says Israel's methods of defending itself are "inhuman and counterproductive." It could be said that they are all the more inhuman because they are counterproductive. Did Israel really think that destroying Lebanon's infrastructure and creating one million Lebanese refugees would weaken Hezbollah?

That's the problem. It is hard to believe that the military and political culture is still so backward that it doesn't understand guerrilla and counter-insurgency warfare. Apparently, no one's told Israel (or the U.S., for that matter) that brute military force does not scare or intimidate anymore - if it ever did. Whatever doesn't kill Hezbollah only makes it stronger.

I take for granted that "government doesn't work." Still, the incompetence government shows is sometimes so great that, like the coach who punts on first down, I have to wonder if there is another, hidden agenda. And that raises the question, what is the real reason behind Israel's bombing Lebanon? Is Israel really just "defending itself?"

Israel intends to advance to the Litani River, displacing Lebanese and rooting out Hezbollah along the way. One wonders whether Israel will stay there forever. If Israel stays, it has a ready excuse. They need to occupy the land as a buffer, to keep Hezbollah that much further away from Israel proper. They had to destroy Lebanon's infrastructure and economy to prevent it from resisting.

But then the occupiers could tell themselves, "Hey, look! Water! You know, since we're here anyway..."

It may very well be that Hezbollah's capture of two Israeli soldiers is just the long-awaited pretext for a war of conquest. Israel is a small and parched country. The Litani River would be a valuable source for a country that's running out of water. The river was also the dream of Israel founder David Ben-Gurion. Territorial expansion has been Israel's quest since its inception. Israel has taken land before, on the pretext of creating buffers from hostile neighbors. But Israelis then settled these territories, expanding Israel's de facto if not official borders.

Israeli Gideon Levy points out, "When the other side is quiet, why return territories? And when they do go to war, ‘there's nobody to talk to,' and certainly not while we are ‘under fire.'

I don't know if Israel's real goal is to destroy Lebanon so as to steal a portion of it. What I do know is that this would at least explain Israel's actions. True, this would mean that Israel would have lost its claim to the moral high ground. True, it would make Hezbollah fighters look less like "terrorists" and more like patriots defending their homeland. But there would also be some small comfort in this.

Let me illustrate. A man may kill a woman to steal her diamonds. Another man may kill a woman just for the pleasure of killing. Both murders are terrible and inexcusable. But we can call the first a criminal, and the second a madman. Which would you rather deal with?

I'd rather have criminals in charge of nations, rather than madmen. For the criminal thinks of his own self-interest; he knows when he's gone too far, and when he has to back down. The madman knows no such constraints.

If Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is not invading Lebanon for its land and water, then I hope he and President Bush come to their senses and agree to a cease-fire, soon. Very soon.

Comments (2)

Post a Comment

Steve Scott from San Fran Bay Area, CA writes:
August 11, 2006

You might have already read Gary North's LRC article -http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north470.html - about conspiracy and conspiracy theories, and Rushdoony's views, but Andrew Sandlin, formerly with Chalcedon, has an interesting critique - http://www.andrewsandlin.net/?p=300 - not that I agree with everything, but it might shed some light.

Could it be that they have simply worked themselves into a blind frenzy and have lost control of their senses?


Carl McCoy from New Hampshire USA writes:
August 16, 2006
I suppose this article is more tongue-in-cheek than serious reflection upon the facts. How else to explain the author's lack of understanding Israel's reason for invading Lebanon. It is no secret that the fascist United States Government and the Zionist Israel Government intend to wage war with Iran and Syria. Their only problem is getting them to strike first so America can claim the moral high-ground. The U.S. and Israel attacked Lebanon for one primary reason, and a myriad of secondary reasons. The primary reason was to eliminate, as much as possible, that area from becomming a front in a ground war with Syria and/or Iran. That is common, military logic that anyone should be able to grasp. The second reason Israel and the U.S. attacked Lebanon was to try and bait Syria and Iran into coming to Hezbollah's aid, and thus giving the U.S. an excuse to come to Israel's aid. These are the two main reasons for the outrageous and appalling destruction and killing carried out by the IDF with the lethal arsenal provided by the Bush cabal. Knowing the deep level of corruption and evil dwelling within the hearts and minds of the leaders of these two countries, I am sure the targeting of innocent civilians, as well as the civilian infrastructure of Lebanon, was a joyful and exhilrating experience for them all. The sight of slaughtered children and their destroyed homes must ofsent shivers of excitement up their spines. These people are intent on a one world dictatorship, ruled by an oligarchy of banking interests and their elite toadys.

Get your heads out of your butts, people! Rise up and resist now, or your grandchildren will damn you forever.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*

Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.

Please type the letters you see above.


Bookmark and Share

Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)

RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article I Stand with Folks of Color
What it takes to color our world with kindness
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/14/20
Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?
Remembering Regis Philbin
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/7/20
It Was John's Time
Celebrating the legacy of Congressman John Lewis
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 7/30/20
Here is the Church
A new look at a childhood finger play
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 7/24/20
The Guardians of Right
Who ultimately should decide what is left?
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 7/17/20
Wear a Mask!
A pandemic plea for courtesy
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 7/10/20
A Prayer for the Divided States of America
Interceding for our Uncle Sam
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 7/2/20

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.

RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?
Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2020 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top