Home
Loading
  Contact Us    
Cooperation, not Violence

Replacing the cycles of history with something better.


by James Leroy Wilson
January 23, 2002

Bookmark and Share


Cooperation, not Violence_James Leroy Wilson-Replacing the cycles of history with something better. Faithful readers of my column may detect an evolution of sorts in my thoughts. Last summer, I dedicated two columns to the subject of taxation, advocating ridding ourselves of the present system and replacing it with a sales tax. It was largely an argument based on making taxes as much a non-factor on the economy as could be possible, thereby encouraging free enterprise, less government, and, more significantly, less need for government. Last week, I advocated the same cause of abolishing the income tax, but with a different, moral argument. The income tax, I argued, was the state's claim on your life; if the fruits of your labor belongs to the state, which allows you to keep only what the government decides it doesn't need, then you are functionally a slave of the government.

Last week's column was a direct result of my re-formulation of government as nothing more than a monopoly of violence, which was an epiphany from two months ago: it is neither arms nor economic freedom that causes wars, but rather collectivism and nationalism.

But the "economic freedom" argument might not go far with some people. And there is one reason: many people think that for some people to prosper, others become poorer. All of economic life is a zero-sum game: some win, others lose. Their political theory is that the rich use government to protect their wealth, and that the poor should therefore use government to take that wealth "back" to their more deserving hands.

There are plenty of historical reasons to play this game. It's a game that I just can't play, however, for three reasons.

First, and least convincing for the secular culture, is my belief that love is a "real" thing, existing independently of individual human thought, feeling or will, and that this reality called love is God. Self-evidently, God loves us and wants what's best for us. Which means what's best for me, and what's best for you, and what's best for everyone else. Obviously, the contents of what's "best" in life is particular to the person; basic physical differences among people are evidence that the specifics for what's best for each is not best for all. But if love is God, God is love, and God is real, then, obviously, what's best for any particular person can not and does not come at the expense of somebody else. Therefore, the rich do not have to deny what's best for the poor to protect their wealth, and the poor do not have to deny what's best for the rich to gain whatever is best for them.

Second, is the lessons of Robert Axelrod's book The Evolution of Cooperation, other studies in game theory, and other affirmations of benevolent common sense. "Prisoner's Dilemma" games have multiple players and multiple encounters with each player. The price of cooperating with a betrayer is steep; the reward for betraying a cooperator is high. To get the most points in an encounter, one must betray another player who's trying to be cooperative. To get the second-most points is to be mutually cooperative, while getting the second-worst points is to mutually betray. But time after time, again and again, it has been established that the "Tit for Tat" strategy, cooperating at first with everyone, while betraying at second encounters only those that betrayed you the first time, proved to be the ultimate points-getter. And the "Tit for Tat" strategists actually protected even more cooperative and forgiving players who yielded even more points.

The effect of such games is to establish in our economic thinking that mutual cooperation, not exploitation, is the engine for maximizing benefits for all. Adam Smith's "invisible hand" of prosperity, in which people seeking mutually advantageous, cooperative exchanges, has pretty much been verified in game theory.

The third reason has to do with the nature of violence, of power, itself. It doesn't require the condemnation of God, or the allure of points in game theory, to know that power corrupts; violence corrupts. Violence thrives on the assumption that other people can't be trusted, not even to look after their own best interests. The entire reason there is violence on the earth is because we have deceived ourselves into thinking that somebody else's gain comes only at our expense, or that the only way we can gain is at somebody else's expense.

I will grant that that assumption is historically justified, but only because it is a story that keeps repeating itself. The leftists will keep on thinking that they need the state to elevate the poor because they only know of right-wingers using the state to oppress the poor. But if the state was limited only to using violence of legal, authorized force to check, deter, and eliminate the violence of attacks and fraud, then it is evident to me that the welfare the people is elevated, because cooperative mutual exchanges increase wealth for both parties.

In theology and in theory, I am convinced that the world is so ordered to provide benefits for all, not exclusive rewards for some and misery for others. And the only lesson from history that I can gather is that those who sought liberty and peace got both more than those who sought power and its violent institutions. We have to do better than playing the tired old violent games of history. Government can be an agent for liberty, not violence and oppression, if only we let it.

Comments (2)


Post a Comment

Right Reverend from Wisconsin writes:
January 23, 2002
Jim Wilson wrote Adam Smith's 'invisible hand' of prosperity, in which people seeking mutually advantageous, cooperative exchanges, has pretty much been verified in game theory.

Mutual advantage is hard to establish when finite resources are at the heart of the exchange, e.g. the fertile bottom land, vs. the hillside, water rights, oil rights, and so on.

There are also people who are kept out of the game by illness or disaster.

James Leroy Wilson writes:
January 23, 2002
But resources are not finite. Money and the division of labor have given people throughout history the ability to find and use more resources in different, more efficient, and ever-better ways.

Granted, there are people left out of the game. But a one-size-fits-all, government solution creates bureaucrats, lobbyists, and crooks whose livelihoods depend on the continuation of social problems. There are no guarantees in liberty - the only guarantee in government is that government will entrench the very problems it seeks to solve.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*


Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Location:


Comments:*
Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.



Verification:
Please type the letters you see above.

  Printer-Friendly

Bookmark and Share


PO BOOKS BY JAMES LEROY WILSON
Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
EMAIL ALERTS
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
Cooperation, not Violence
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)


RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article May I Be Frank, Mr. President?
Challenging a double standard in the Oval Office
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/15/17
Salvator Mundi
Not the painting but the Person
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/7/17
When the Newsman Becomes News
Lamenting yet another fallen hero
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/1/17
Let's Hear It for Moms and Pops
Celebrating Small Business Saturday in a very personal way
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/22/17
An Earthquake in La La Land
Examining what's been exposed in the rubble
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/17/17
Where is God?
Reflecting on the tragedy in a little Texas town
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/10/17
An All Saints Day Tribute
Remembering those who left us
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/3/17

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.


RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2017 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top