Home
Loading
  Contact Us    
Beatles or Stones?

Dr. Spin receives his first questions.

by Dr. Spin
May 6, 2002

Bookmark and Share


Beatles or Stones?_Dr. Spin-Dr. Spin receives his first questions. The following letter to Dr. Spin was possibly shortened in a temporary malfunction of the mail system.

Beatles or Stones?

BoS


Dear BoS,

Thanks for the first letter! I’m not sure what you’re asking by “Beatles or Stones?”

If your asking which band is larger, that would be the Rolling Stones. The Beatles were always a quartet, whereas the Rolling Stones have been traditionally a quintet. Also, the Rolling Stones have had more members; the Beatles consisted of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr. The Rolling Stones started with Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Bill Wyman, Charlie Watts, and Brian Jones. Brian Jones was replaced by Mick Taylor, who was then replaced by Ron Wood. Bill Wyman quit recently, and although they replaced him with another bassist on tour, that other bassist is not considered a member of the Rolling Stones as of yet.

An interesting footnote to that: the Beatles have more former members who have passed away. John Lennon was killed in 1980, and of course, George Harrison passed away last year. Brian Jones, who drowned in his pool in 1969, is the only member (current or former) of the Rolling Stones that has died, although some people think Keith Richards has been brain-dead for years, and only has the capacity to smoke and play “Satisfaction,” which is why the Stones keep touring.

As to which band recorded more, that would be also the Stones. The Beatles recording career lasted only from 1962 to 1970. The Stones started recording in 1963 and still cut an album every now and then. I believe the Beatles have more number one hits than the Stones, though the Stones certainly have been recording long enough to have caught them by now.

The Beatles however made more films during their career as a band. Other than a few concert movies, I don’t think the Rolling Stones have ever made a film proper, although Mick Jagger has probably acted in more films than any member of the Beatles.

Now, if you’re asking which band is better, that is always a matter of taste, and my taste tends to lead towards the Beatles. Both bands are considered part of the “Big Three” of ‘60’s Rock bands, with the Who being the third. Debate as to which band is best ranges from musicianship, to popularity, to influence, to which band is just more cool. While one can argue that Keith Richards seems to display better craftsmanship over the guitar than George Harrison, for the type of songs they’re playing, each is perfect. Would a George Harrison solo work in “Nineteenth Nervous Breakdown?” Would Keith Richards find the right hook for “Day Tripper?” It all depends on how you like your Rock ‘n’ Roll.

For me it comes down to listenability (yes, it’s a word! We Rockology PhDs use it all the time!). If I feel like listening to music, any music, the Beatles almost always come to mind. Their ability to diversify their sound and yet keep it essentially Beatles makes the Beatles almost always listenable. The Stones are always at the heart a rockabilly/blues band. They can waver into the soft (“As Time Goes By,” “Ruby Tuesday”), and even the psychedelic (“She’s Like a Rainbow,” “2000 Light Years from Home”), but they’re at their best with songs like “Midnight Rambler,” “Brown Sugar,” and “It’s Only Rock ‘n’ Roll.”

Thanks for your question, and keep ‘em coming!


Dear "Doctor,"

If you were a big fan, you would realize that there is space on the PO for just ONE know-it-all. I know what you and the Webmaster are doing. It's like ABC with the whole Ted Koppel/David Letterman thing. Well, revenge is a dish best served cold.

In Time,
Dear Jon


Dear DJ

Hey! Your initials make you a deejay! In an article about music! What a coincidence!

Despite that you’ve violated my primary rules about my column, A) letters are to be of a musical nature, and B) letters are supposed to ask questions, not give statements, I will answer your letter by stating the following.

The Webmaster warned me about this, but I figured his assessment was a simple editor/staff member feud. Now I realize you truly are a paranoid, delusional man with a misplaced sense of grandeur and a control freak! Threaten me in my own column, will you! Just remember two can play at your game. In time, indeed…

Comments (1)


Post a Comment

Darren Duran from Kittery, Maine writes:
December 3, 2011
Neither. The Who.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*


Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Location:


Comments:*
Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.



Verification:
Please type the letters you see above.

  Printer-Friendly

Bookmark and Share


RSS FEED
RSS Feed for Dr. Spin: RSS Feed for Dr. Spin
EMAIL ALERTS
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
Beatles or Stones?
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by Dr. Spin
Last Time Around
Dr. Spin ends his column
by Dr. Spin, 1/23/06
An Eclectic Group of Letters
Dr. Spin answers questions on Gospel music, jam bands and more.
by Dr. Spin, 12/26/05
Voices and Videos
On attractive female singers and what makes a good music video.
by Dr. Spin, 12/12/05
Dress For Success
What do musicians' outfits tell you about their music?
by Dr. Spin, 11/28/05
Should you listen to H.I.M?
A concerned fan questions a band's loyalty.
by Dr. Spin, 11/14/05
A Brief History of Modern Music, Part II
Part 2 in a series
by Dr. Spin, 10/3/05
A Brief History of Modern Music, Part I
Dr. Spin helps a fellow POer define the terms of contemporary music.
by Dr. Spin, 9/19/05
» Complete List (101)


RSS FEED
RSS Feed for Dr. Spin: RSS Feed for Dr. Spin

Recently Published
View Article May I Be Frank, Mr. President?
Challenging a double standard in the Oval Office
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/15/17
Salvator Mundi
Not the painting but the Person
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/7/17
When the Newsman Becomes News
Lamenting yet another fallen hero
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/1/17
Let's Hear It for Moms and Pops
Celebrating Small Business Saturday in a very personal way
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/22/17
An Earthquake in La La Land
Examining what's been exposed in the rubble
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/17/17
Where is God?
Reflecting on the tragedy in a little Texas town
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/10/17
An All Saints Day Tribute
Remembering those who left us
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/3/17

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.


RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2017 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top