Home
Loading
  Contact Us    
How Dumb Do We Have to Be?

To vote, that is.

by Barnabas
October 23, 2002

Bookmark and Share


How Dumb Do We Have to Be?_Barnabas-To vote, that is. Anonymity, even an unguarded anonymity like mine, has its downside. I can’t be as specific as I would like to be when it comes to state or local matters without blowing the little cover I have.

I’ll limit myself to saying that I hope your state is enjoying a higher level of political campaigning than ours is. Our race for governor, between two supposedly qualified and experienced candidates of the major parties, has been consistently nasty for several weeks now. I say “supposedly” because their hiring of the political consultants and advertising agencies they have used calls into question both their intelligence (the absurd aspect of this column) and their moral integrity (the ethical aspect). The campaign theory appears to be that the candidate who gets the last dirty punch in before election day is going to win. The dirty punches even lack humor. They are simply mean.

We used to speak of “taking the high road.” When you take the high road, you engage the candidates who are taking the high road with you; you don’t have to join those who take the low road and allow them to set the tone. You don’t even say “I’ll take the high road if you will”; inherent in taking the high road is the willingness to take it alone. It may be full of potholes, but it is not the sinkhole that the low road has become.

It’s too late for the high road in this campaign this year. Both candidates are mired in the low road and slugging it out; neither of them is too attractive right now. As a voter I am sorry that they were not smart enough to avoid this disaster. I am also offended that they think I am dumb enough to want to join either of them in the sinkhole.

Their campaign has raised the question of how dumb they expect me to be. I would have to be very dumb indeed to pay much attention to the content of their attack ads. Certainly they want me to be too dumb to think, and would rather I voted on the basis of the selfishness, bigotry, and suspicion targeted by their ads.

I don’t think I will. I’ll probably do as most voters will, and vote by default for the candidate of my traditional party affiliation. This is to say that the campaign was a waste (In the past, perhaps half the time since 1960, I have voted in the governor’s race for the candidate of the other party. I thought about a third candidate who has name recognition but no statewide experience (Jesse Ventura comes to mind). My rejection of his candidacy is at least based on philosophical issues; I had to think about it, which apparently I am not expected to do as a Republican or Democrat.

Maybe, out there somewhere, a viable third party is being born—or at least some political consultants who know what they are doing.

Comments (1)


Post a Comment

James Leroy Wilson from Chicago writes:
October 23, 2002
Dear Editor,

There is yet another option for Barnabas: not voting. It is not a shirking of civic duty to refuse to choose between two bad options. To vote for one of the candidates will just encourage him - he won't know the difference between his enthusiastic supporters and the reluctant, because each vote counts only once.

But if you don't vote, you have no right to complain. That would be valid only for those who preferred one candidate over the other but were to lazy to vote. To withhold one's support from an immature brand of politics may actually be the more patriotic option.



Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*


Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Location:


Comments:*
Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.



Verification:
Please type the letters you see above.

  Printer-Friendly

Bookmark and Share


EMAIL ALERTS
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
How Dumb Do We Have to Be?
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by Barnabas
Barnabas Says Goodbye
Moving on, not moving out.
by Barnabas, 1/19/05
Seats on the Fifty-Yard Line
Yet another American value.
by Barnabas, 1/12/05
Ethical Endgame
When children become sexual slaves.
by Barnabas, 12/15/04
Eighteen Years on Death Row
We have redefined 'speedy trial' and 'cruel and unusual.'
by Barnabas, 12/8/04
Hard on Drugs, Soft in the Head
Legalizing marijuana.
by Barnabas, 12/1/04
Wesley and Wal-Mart
Destructive competition as a stinky enterprise.
by Barnabas, 11/24/04
The Mandate to Govern
Third party time.
by Barnabas, 11/17/04
» Complete List (137)


Recently Published
View Article Salvator Mundi
Not the painting but the Person
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/7/17
When the Newsman Becomes News
Lamenting yet another fallen hero
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/1/17
Let's Hear It for Moms and Pops
Celebrating Small Business Saturday in a very personal way
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/22/17
An Earthquake in La La Land
Examining what's been exposed in the rubble
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/17/17
Where is God?
Reflecting on the tragedy in a little Texas town
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/10/17
An All Saints Day Tribute
Remembering those who left us
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/3/17
A Mighty Fortress was His God
Remembering the legacy of Martin Luther 500 years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/27/17

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.


RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2017 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top