Contact Us    
Are the 'Theocrats' Really All That Bad?

There are more important things than the strict Separation of Church and State.

by James Leroy Wilson
May 5, 2005

Bookmark and Share
Are the 'Theocrats' Really All That Bad?

One characteristic of our age is that we often misidentify our enemies. When so many things are so far from the ideal, we get hysterical about the little things and ignore the big. We are bothered by some violation of principle, while we ignore other things far more dangerous and important.

For example, those who proclaim that they believe in limited government would say that providing for the common defense is one of its few proper functions. They would also say that the government has no business funding the arts. And it is easy to get very, very angry about some of the crap (and piss) that the taxpayer has been forced to pay for over the years. I know I have.

But what is the few hundred millions of dollars the federal government spends on the arts, compared to several hundred billions spent on "defense?" It is easy to say, if we grant that this is a governmental function, that it be adequately funded. But that doesn't mean we should turn an uncritical eye toward defense spending. It doesn't explain how stationing our troops in 120 countries around the world, or involving ourselves in the Korean Peninsula or Palestine or Iraq, contributes to our "defense." The amount of waste and counter-productivity in the Defense Department probably matches in two days the entire waste of the NEA. Which means that the actual harm done to the taxpayer by Defense is hundreds of times greater than the harm done by the NEA.

Conservatives in Washington no longer waste political capital trying to abolish the NEA. And if I were President, I probably wouldn't either. I'd be too busy fighting the military-industrial complex and other big-ticket thieves, even though, in principle, the NEA is a greater affront to my libertarianism. "Limited" government means limited not just in its functions, but in its size.

It's a question of trade-offs. Some battles over principle are trivial compared to real-word battles for our liberty and prosperity. One doctrine of the American civil religion, is the "separation of Church and State." Think of the Inquisition, the Salem witch trials, sectarian civil wars, yada yada yada. Points well taken, although the death tolls hardly compare with the record of the irreligious Genghis Kahn, let alone of 20th century atheist tyrants. I do believe in the separation of Church and State. But if I were a libertarian in England or Sweden, would disestablishing the State Church be my biggest priority? Is that where the greatest waste, the greatest harm, the greatest violation of my rights, is going on? It is very possible to see a small portion of one's taxes go to support a State Church, and still, relative to the rest of the world, be quite free. And it is possible to live in a rigidly secular State and be unfree.

This issue is not trivial, considering the hysteria from leftist and some libertarian circles over the "theocrats." The purpose behind using this word is to equate to the views of the President's conservative Christian base with the social philosophy of the Taliban. Now, I loathe the Bush Administration and do not understand why anyone would support it. But let's not also forget that, on many of the social and moral issues that the Christian Right is concerned about, many are about federalism. Neither abortion nor prayer in schools would be an issue were it not for the unconstitutional intervention of the Supreme Court. Restoring federalism is a worthy libertarian goal, and there's no point in alienating potential allies in that goal. Seeing some violations of the "separation of Church and State," which isn't even what the First Amendment says, is a small price to pay to restore the Tenth Amendment.

Further, we should remember what the real enemy is. What is, truly, a bigger violation of the separation of Church and State: a page in a science textbook summarizing alternative theories to Darwinism, or the very institution of the public school itself? Education is ultimately about the dissemination of values, and the purpose of public education is to make it more costly for parents to give their children a religious education. Public education costs each of us many thousands of dollars per year, with ever-diminishing results. THAT is the real crime, the real danger.

Thus, it makes no sense to "dislike religion in politics even more than [to] dislike big government." I'd rather a tax be cut for religious reasons than a tax be raised for secular reasons. Bush's wars for "democracy" and "liberty" are wars for purely secular ideals. Is a war of aggression any less just because it is to spread an ideology instead of a religion? Is it wrong to ban pornography for religious reasons, but right to ban it for secular reasons? Does it matter why the Fat Nazis, Drug Warriors, and Tobacco Fascists believe in their nutty causes?

Tyranny is tyranny, and big government is big government. It is wrong for the devoutly religious to try to "help" God by launching religious crusades, invading our privacy, and redistributing our wealth. But it is no less wrong for secularists to try to replace God with the State by exacting greater tithes and imposing more rules than any religion's scriptures dared imagine.

What good is it to support the Separation of Church and State, but not also the Separations of School and State, Charity and State, and the Market and State? Christian conservatives deserve heaps of criticism and condemnation, particularly in their support for Bush's War. But the enemy of the "theocrat" is not necessarily the friend of reason and liberty.

Comments (3)

Post a Comment

Douglas Young from Frisco, TX writes:
July 29, 2005
Tonight I have scanned through the archives of Mr. Wilson and read a number of columns, of which the titles caught my attention. Earlier, I believe I read one of the best pieces ever on America's greatest strength also being her nemesis.

This article is equally brilliant. I am a libertarian with deep religious convictions and I think Mr. Wilson is really on the mark in this piece.

I am really am impressed with his writing.

I found The Partial Observer several nights ago and am really impressed with what I have read so far.


Philip Glass writes:
August 22, 2005
So we are to ignore the little picture in order to fix the big?

Say for instance, you are on your way in a hurry to somewhere, anywhere. As you run you find your shoe untied. So, do you stop and tie your shoe, or do you keep running? Of course stopping would slow you down from getting to your destination, but fixing the little problem could help you get there.

And public education may increase the price for a religious education, but what makes religious education so important? Promoting alternatives to Darwin's theory only promotes open-mindedness, which the youger generation is going to need for their diverse future.

James Leroy Wilson from Independent Country writes:
August 25, 2005
We must see the big picture and what's wrong with it if we are to understand the real problem behind the little pictures, and which ones to fix first.

What makes religious education so important? ALL education, ALL attempts to instill values in the young, is religious in nature. Its just a question of whose religion will be taught: those of parents, or those of bureaucratic social engineers and their political patrons.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*

Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.

Please type the letters you see above.


Bookmark and Share

Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)

RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article A Final Word
It’s been a good ride
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/20/21
The Last Post
The Partial Observer is no more
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/15/21
The Challenges and Chances of Change
Announcing a coming change
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/8/21
On Each Continent We Worship
A new hymn for World Communion Sunday
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/1/21
Tending the Family Tree
A grandparent's charge
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/24/21
The Cross is Our Ground Zero
Why the cross is the crux of our faith
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/17/21
A Score Recalled
Remembering September 11th twenty years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/10/21

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.

RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?
Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2021 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top