Contact Us    
The Futility of Hope

To create a better world, we need more personal transformation instead of political reform.

by James Leroy Wilson
August 21, 2008

Bookmark and Share
The Futility of Hope

Although new posts are now very infrequent, Jeff Wells' Rigorous Intuition is a must-read blog for those seeing deeper connections, and spiritual dimensions, to the news of the day. But as the news of war, high crimes, and environmental doom provokes more gloom, Wells, a Canadian socialist, concludes:

"So here it is: they've won. Or let me rephrase that, since there will never be universal agreement as to who they' are: we've lost.

Because life is short, even if I get another turn after this one, I'd rather not waste half of it relearning all the secret wrongs done to the world that I can't undo. So I need to know what, if anything, we get out of knowing what they get away with. And if it's so we may better "organize," then good luck and God bless us playing catch-up, since the priesthoods and kingly classes have had a 10,000 year head start."

In contrast, the English libertarian Sean Gabb notes,

"Most people no longer die at absurdly young ages. Most people do not see half their children cough and sweat their way to early graves. We all have enough to eat. We have soap and water and warm clothes. We have an endless succession of shiny electronic toys to divert us. In another decade or so, what we have now will doubtless seem as inadequate as MSDOS and video cassettes now do to us. But we already live in something approximating the utopia of the early twentieth century science fiction writers."

It sounds like a view opposite of Wells's. But then Gabb asks:

"So why so much unhappiness? . . .We did briefly touch on whether mass enrichment has been accompanied by a loss of freedom and of identity. Very few people may want to do any of the things that have been banned over the past century. But everyone is in some sense aware of the immense structures of guardianship that shape our lives. And everyone to some extent has noticed the rise of a new and utterly malevolent ruling class, that enriches and privileges itself behind a palisade of words about 'equality' and 'diversity' and 'tolerance.'"

But are these "kingly classes" conscious of their own corruption and neglect? Are they aware just how tyrannical their laws really are? Or are they doing the best they can? Is this just the "March of History?"

Almost everyone knows that something is terribly wrong. But the socialist looks at state-run capitalism, mistakes it for the "free market" and believes free marketeers are part of the "they" who are "winning." And free marketeers think the socialists, with their desires for more regulations and welfare, are on the side that's winning.

On a similar note, gay activists and the Religious Right see each other as a threat to civilization. The Right sees open immigration, mulitculturalism, and Islam as threats to our culture, and believe the Left is on the side that's winning because they've taken over the educational system. The Left thinks the Right is winning because of corporate greed and an expanding police state.

It seems to me, however, that over the past seven years we have had more of just about everything. More Politically Correct intolerance AND more religious intolerance. More problems (rightly or wrongly) attributed to "capitalism" AND more Big Government failures. More police-state surveillance AND more access to alternative viewpoints. More nation-destroying "multiculturalism" AND more goose-stepping "nationalism."

But, although the post-9-11 world may have taken everything to greater extremes, didn't we think many of the same things in the 1990's and 1980's? Do not many similar conflicts date back to the Founding? Or even to the Magna Charta and before?

It raises the question of whether there is a "winner" and a "loser." Perhaps things just are, and how one judges the eternal world is a reflection of how one interprets one's own perceptions and experiences. That is, how one feels inside will greatly determine how one feels about the world at large. Some will feel, "many things are better, some things are worse" whereas others will feel "some things are better, but most things are worse."

In the end, how do we know there is a "they" who's winning while "we" are losing? Winning what? Losing what? To paraphrase John Maynard Keynes, in the long run, aren't we all dead? Does it make sense to "rage against the machine," to be angry at institutions and systems one is powerless to change or control? Doesn't it make more sense to love everyone non-judgmentally (remembering that you, too, would not want to be judged), and cheefully give to those in need?

I wonder what would happen if most well-meaning individuals everywhere just quit placing their hope in politics. If they stopped voting for increased entitlements for themselves and stopped voting for candidates who would impose "morality" and "social justice" on others through force. If they sought not political reform, but personal transformation.

Perhaps "resistance is futile," as the Borg claims in Star Trek. Perhaps "hope," which banks on a "better" future, is not "audacious" but is instead equally futile. Perhaps you are powerless to "change the system." That doesn't mean you should be unhappy. That doesn't mean you can't show love, courtesy, and compassion to others. That doesn't mean you are not free. For freedom comes from within, not from the without. If you can undermine the State and loosen the external restraints, by all means go ahead! But it is very possible that mankind just isn't capable of a peaceful, prosperous, just, and long-lasting civilization. Perhaps decay is just in the nature of things, including human societies; how are you so sure you can fix that?

Whether History calls you a "winner" or a "loser" will depend largely on your nationality and class; you, as an individual, will most likely be forgotten. So, really, the more reliable method for achieving a "better world" is not by resorting to swords and lawyers, but by finding some way through which you can become a better person. 

Comments (1)

Post a Comment

ELM from 98801 writes:
September 6, 2008
Right you are! Ghandi said, "You must be the change you want to see in the world". Sad revelation to watch heads of state and all others that took an oath to represent us ALL proudly engaging in the lowest grade of political warfare; gunnysacking, swiftboating and hitting below the belt. The 2009 race for U.S. president is a prime example of bullish mockery. I have watched those redundant and dastardly low blows delivered, followed by a wide smile and the pause that awaits applause. Not a pause that is refreshing. Obvious never having read Karl Menniger's book called "The Art Of Fair Fighting" or his book called "Man Against Self", they don't get it and overlook that not everyone just fell off the turnip truck

There will always be those who are unenlightened and pukingly project their own image on others rather than introspecting their own. BUT, GOD FORBID they be those who run our country!!!! In the quest for fame and fortune, only the man or woman in the mirror looking back at you is one you can't fool!

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*

Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.

Please type the letters you see above.


Bookmark and Share

» jim102670@yahoo.com

Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)

RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article A Final Word
It’s been a good ride
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/20/21
The Last Post
The Partial Observer is no more
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/15/21
The Challenges and Chances of Change
Announcing a coming change
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/8/21
On Each Continent We Worship
A new hymn for World Communion Sunday
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/1/21
Tending the Family Tree
A grandparent's charge
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/24/21
The Cross is Our Ground Zero
Why the cross is the crux of our faith
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/17/21
A Score Recalled
Remembering September 11th twenty years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/10/21

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.

RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?
Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2021 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top